What is the safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?

If  Get more info 've ever been through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create issues for users.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to many potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
http://kidneymosque5.xtgem.com/__xt_blog/__xtblog_entry/__xtblog_entry/34057701-what-lengths-can-you-get-from-your-5g-mobile-phone-tower-without-staying-unsafe?__xtblog_block_id=1#xt_blog

Have you ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that a safe location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.

While this sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that those living close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were away from the antennas.

However, this study also found that people who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.

This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the most important organ in the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.

In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In  https://www.pearltrees.com/bowspain4/item515644840 , psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.